Our reading desk
Sources and our perspective
Independent reports and guidance, with a plain-English Humantra-AI perspective. Newest dated sources first.
19 October 2026
WeAreTechWomen
In this opinion piece, Laura Foster questions whether counting AI use misses what matters: judgement, checking and useful results. She argues for understanding differences in how people use AI, rather than treating more frequent use as the goal. This is the author’s perspective, not proof that one gender uses AI better.
Read our perspective →: Women are using AI less, but what if that’s not the real problem?22 September 2026
Learning and Work Institute and The Rigby Foundation
Independent research from Learning and Work Institute and The Rigby Foundation makes the case for investing in people alongside AI tools. Its accompanying article describes a modelled £80 billion economic opportunity by 2035—not a guaranteed return for an individual business.
Read our perspective →: AI skills: why investment in people matters17 September 2026
Pew Research Center
Views of AI differ across ages and countries. Age alone does not tell us what someone knows, worries about or can learn.
Read our perspective →: Global views of AI differ by agePage 1 of 3 · Collection updated 31 October 2026. Publishers do not endorse Humantra-AI. Findings do not promise the same result for every organisation.